You shipped the product. The page was the afterthought.
Maker pages fail differently from funded-startup pages: nobody wrote the copy twice. A Squint teardown reads yours like a stranger with eight seconds and a credit card - and hands you lines you can paste in tonight.
The leaks we find over and over on maker pages:
- The feature list that never lands a punch. Six bullets of what it does, zero sentences on what changes for the buyer. Features are evidence; the claim comes first.
- Pricing hidden like a secret. Buyers who have to hunt for the price assume they can't afford it - or worse, that it's "contact us". Solo products win by being refreshingly explicit.
- The empty-proof fold. No numbers, no users, no testimonials yet? There are honest proof substitutes - a real changelog, a public roadmap, your own usage - and pages that fake it instead read as fake.
- One page doing four jobs. Docs, blog, support form, and sales pitch stacked on the homepage. The sales page gets one job: the next click.
- Screenshots at the wrong zoom. A full-app screenshot at 30% scale communicates "complicated". Crop to the one screen that makes someone want the rest.
See the standard on a page most makers know: teardown #001 reviews Gumroad's homepage - the platform half the indie web sells through, held to the same five-part method your page would be.
What you get for $19: the squint test, an annotated desktop + mobile walkthrough, copy rewrites you can paste in, a structure/CTA/proof audit, and a fix list ranked by impact against effort. Automated capture and analysis; the report is typically in your inbox within minutes. 14-day no-questions refund.